James Jackson v. City of Huntington Park et al
| James Jackson |
| City of Huntington Park, Paul Munoz, Joshua Volasgis and Does Unknown Huntington Park Police Officers designated as Does 1 through 10, inclusive, in their individual capacity |
| 2:2024cv00488 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 On March 1, 2024, the Court updated its standing orders, including the Civil Standing Order, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Order, the Motion for Summary Judgment Order, and the Civil Pretrial and Trial Order. The parties are directed to read and, where possible (e.g., on any summary judgment motion for which the parties have not yet exchanged papers), comply with these updated standing orders, which can be found on Judge Blumenfeld's webpage. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Paul Munoz. (gk) |
| Filing 11 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Joshua Volasgis. (gk) |
| Filing 10 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant City of Huntington Park. (gk) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #8 filed by Plaintiff James Jackson. (Goldstein, Peter) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached." Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (gk) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff James Jackson. (Goldstein, Peter) |
Filing 6
Civil standing order upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet, and No. 2 Certification as to Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36752245 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff JAMES JACKSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties) (Attorney Peter Goldstein added to party JAMES JACKSON(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
