Bin Feng v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| BIN FENG |
| Ur M. Jaddou, John Daly, Jr., Torres Lory and Corina Luna |
| 2:2024cv00507 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #10 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: This case is STAYED until July 9, 2025. By no later than April 1, 2025, and June 2, 2025, the parties shall file Joint Status Reports updating the Court on the status of the immigration proceedings. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Defendants John Daly, Jr., Ur M. Jaddou, Corina Luna. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party John Daly, Jr.(pty:dft), Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party Corina Luna(pty:dft))(Messuri, Anthony) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR Motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Subpoena Request (AO 88) #2 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Summons Request. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants John Daly, Jr., Ur M. Jaddou, Corina Luna. (sh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (sh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff BIN FENG, (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BIN FENG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by plaintiff BIN FENG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 01/17/2024, receipt number ACACDC-36756659), filed by plaintiff BIN FENG. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party BIN FENG(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
