Nicolas Rubi v. Maximillian Studios LLC et al
Nicolas Rubi |
Maximillian Studios LLC, Clarence Maximillian Ng and Does 1-10 |
2:2024cv00554 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stephanie S Christensen |
Mark C Scarsi |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Counterclaim, #15 filed by Counterdefendant Nicolas Rubi.(Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 17 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants and Counterclaimants Maximillian Studios LLC, Clarence Maximillian Ng, (Grodsky, Allen) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against Nicolas Rubi filed by Defendants and Counterclaimants Clarence Maximillian Ng, Maximillian Studios LLC.(Attorney Allen B Grodsky added to party Maximillian Studios LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Allen B Grodsky added to party Clarence Maximillian Ng(pty:dft))(Grodsky, Allen) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicolas Rubi, upon Defendant Maximillian Studios LLC served on 1/31/2024, answer due 2/21/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lin Doe -- mother of registered agent/co-occupant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicolas Rubi, upon Defendant Clarence Maximillian Ng served on 1/31/2024, answer due 2/21/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lin Doe - mother/co-occupant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Clarence Maximillian Ng. (ghap) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maximillian Studios LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nicolas Rubi. (Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nicolas Rubi. (Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nicolas Rubi, (Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nicolas Rubi. (Levine, Zachary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36764589 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Nicolas Rubi. (Attorney Zachary Levine added to party Nicolas Rubi(pty:pla))(Levine, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.