United States of America v. $509,573.00 in Bank Funds
Plaintiff: United State of America and United States of America
Defendant: $509,573.00 in Bank Funds and 509,573.00 In Bank Funds
Case Number: 2:2024cv00571
Filed: January 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: A Joel Richlin
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 (In Chambers) Order by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court CONTINUES the status conference set for March 15, 2024 to May 3, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6C.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 7, 2024 Filing 13 STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Waters, Ryan)
March 6, 2024 Filing 12 On March 1, 2024, the Court updated its standing orders, including the Civil Standing Order, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Order, the Motion for Summary Judgment Order, and the Civil Pretrial and Trial Order. The parties are directed to read and, where possible (e.g., on any summary judgment motion for which the parties have not yet exchanged papers), comply with these updated standing orders, which can be found on Judge Blumenfeld's webpage. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 6, 2024 Filing 11 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication on 02/05/2024 and 02/06/2024 upon Defendant 509,573.00 In Bank Funds last date of publication 3/5/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. Publication was made in the official government website www.forfeiture.gov for 30 consecutive days. (Waters, Ryan)
February 26, 2024 Filing 10 (In Chambers) Orderby Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.: The Court sets a status conference for March 15, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6C. No later than March 8, the parties shall submit a joint report addressing the status of the case and the seizure.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER APPOINTING UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE AS SUBSTITUTE CUSTODIAN IN PLACE OF THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon the Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application #4 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon the arrest of the defendant, the United States Secret Service shall assume custody of the defendant on behalf of this Court, in place of the United States Marshal, and shall maintain custody of such defendant during the time it remains in custodia legis, pursuant to Rule G(3)(c)(i) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions and Rule E.14(a) of the Local Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims. See document for further details. (gk)
January 24, 2024 Filing 8 WARRANT for seizure of $509,573.00 In Bank Funds issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (et)
January 24, 2024 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
January 24, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
January 24, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (et)
January 22, 2024 Filing 4 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Appoint Substitute Custodian United States Secret Service in place of United States Marshals Service filed by Plaintiff United State of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Waters, Ryan)
January 22, 2024 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff United State of America. (Waters, Ryan)
January 22, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United State of America. (Waters, Ryan)
January 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff United State of America. (Attorney Ryan Waters added to party United State of America(pty:pla))(Waters, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $509,573.00 in Bank Funds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United State of America
Represented By: Ryan Waters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Ryan Waters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $509,573.00 in Bank Funds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 509,573.00 In Bank Funds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?