Veronica Vargas v. AT and T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
Veronica Vargas |
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 and AT and T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 |
2:2024cv00578 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Otis D Wright |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Veronica Vargas. upon AT and T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/27/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Gilbert M. Nishimura. (Noah, P) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR Motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submitdocuments electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE:Plaintiff's Notice (Other) #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 8 Notice Of Interested Entities of Persons filed by plaintiff Veronica Vargas. (Noah, P) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant AT and T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3. (sh) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Veronica Vargas. (Noah, P) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36767899 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Veronica Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney P Randall Noah added to party Veronica Vargas(pty:pla))(Noah, P) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.