Richard Bassett v. John Doe No. 1 et al
Plaintiff: Richard Bassett
Defendant: Correctional Officer John Doe No. 1 and Correctional Officer John Doe No. 2
Case Number: 2:2024cv00656
Filed: January 24, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T Bristow
Referring Judge: John W Holcomb
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow: granting #6 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File. The Court has read and considered plaintiff's Request and hereby GRANTS the same. Plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00 and his initial partial filing fee of $6.27 shall be paid on or before April 8, 2024. (see document for further details) (hr)
February 28, 2024 Filing 6 LETTER: Extension filed by Plaintiff Richard Bassett.(hr)
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (yl)
January 25, 2024 Filing 4 TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Richard Bassett (hr)
January 25, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (et)
January 24, 2024 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) in Lancaster is DIRECTED to submit a certified Prison Trust Account Statement for Richard Bassett CDC F06286 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account Statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified Prison Trust Account Statement in pdf format to PrisonerFilings_CACD@cacd.uscourts.gov with the case number and inmate name in the subject line as reflected on this notification. filed by Plaintiff. Richard Bassett. (et)
January 24, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow., filed by Plaintiff Richard Bassett. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Bassett v. John Doe No. 1 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Bassett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer John Doe No. 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer John Doe No. 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?