Pax Labs Inc. v. Stiiizy IP LLC et al
| Pax Labs Inc. |
| STIIIZY IP LLC, STIIIZY INC., Stiiizy LLC and Stiiizy Inc. doing business as Shryne Group Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00788 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (rolm) |
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION TO STAY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1659 (ECF No. 20) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. A stay is required in the present action. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending the determination of the Commission becomes final in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1392, including any and all appeals , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for on Defendants Unopposed Motion to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659 and Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Defendants Stiiizy IP LLC, Stiiizy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Alexander Galicki with Exhibit A (Verified Complaint) and Exhibit B (Notice of Institution, #2 Proposed Order) (Galicki, Alexander) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, (Galicki, Alexander) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Alexander George Galicki on behalf of Defendants Stiiizy IP LLC, Stiiizy Inc. (Attorney Alexander George Galicki added to party Stiiizy IP LLC (pty:dft), Attorney Alexander George Galicki added to party Stiiizy Inc.(pty:dft))(Galicki, Alexander) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc., upon Defendant Stiiizy IP LLC served on 2/6/2024, answer due 2/27/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jazmin Aldana, Legalinc Registered Agents, Inc., Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Fuller, Joanna) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc., upon Defendant Stiiizy Inc. served on 2/6/2024, answer due 2/27/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jazmin Aldana, Legalinc Registered Agents, Inc., Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Fuller, Joanna) |
|
Filing 15
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:24-cv-00782 MCS(AJRX). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge John A. Kronstadt to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-00788 MCS(AJRx). Signed by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (rn)
|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Stiiizy IP LLC, Stiiizy Inc. (et) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 10 , no PDF document was attached to docket No. 10 and the electronic notice was not sent. (et) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (lfa)
|
| Filing 10 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 1/30/2024, SEE DOCKET ENTRY #12 ] 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Stiiizy IP LLC, Stiiizy Inc. (et) Modified on 1/30/2024 (et). |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:24-cv-00782 (Fuller, Joanna) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Pax Labs Inc.. (Fuller, Joanna) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc., (Fuller, Joanna) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc.. (Fuller, Joanna) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc.. (Fuller, Joanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36814129 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Pax Labs Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Joanna M Fuller added to party Pax Labs Inc.(pty:pla))(Fuller, Joanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
