Siyu Liu v. Tiffany and Company et al
| Siyu Liu |
| Tiffany and Company, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv00794 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Alka Sagar |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 16 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Fadi Rasheed is sanctioned in the amount of $500, to be paid to the Fiscal Section of the Clerk's office no later than April 18, 2024. See order for details. (jgr)
|
| Filing 30 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #25 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company.(Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 29 JOINT 26(f) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu. (Rasheed, Fadi) |
| Filing 28 DECLARATION of Fadi K. Rasheed re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,, 15 filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu. (Rasheed, Fadi) |
| Filing 27 On March 1, 2024, the Court updated its standing orders, including the Civil Standing Order, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Order, the Motion for Summary Judgment Order, and the Civil Pretrial and Trial Order. The parties are directed to read and, where possible (e.g., on any summary judgment motion for which the parties have not yet exchanged papers), comply with these updated standing orders, which can be found on Judge Blumenfeld's webpage. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 26 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Philip A Toomey counsel for Plaintiff Siyu Liu. Adding Damian J. Martinez as counsel of record for Siyu Liu for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu. (Toomey, Philip) |
| Filing 25 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Siyu Liu amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu(Toomey, Philip) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 23
PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 22
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: PLEASE READ THIS ORDER (AND ATTACHMENT) CAREFULLY: The early post-settlement status conference is set for May 3, 2024, at 8:30 AM. The post-settlement status conference is set for July 19, 2024. The pretrial conference is set for August 16, 2024, at 10:00 AM. The jury trial is set for August 26, 2024, at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DATES AND DEADLINES. (jgr)
|
| Filing 21 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference and Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court heard from the parties about the contents of their joint Rule 26(f) report. A case management order will be issued separately. See minutes for details and filing deadlines. Court Recorder: Court Smart. (jgr) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu, (Toomey, Philip) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Philip A Toomey counsel for Plaintiff Siyu Liu. Filed by Plaintiff Plaintiff. (Attorney Philip A Toomey added to party Siyu Liu(pty:pla))(Toomey, Philip) |
| Filing 18 26(f) REPORT REPORT of 26(f) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu. (Toomey, Philip) |
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Fadi K. Rasheed Re OSC filed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu (Toomey, Philip) |
| Filing 16 DEFENDANT'S REPORT of Rule 26(f) and Case Management Statement filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company. (Deagle, Wynter) |
|
Filing 15
(In Chambers) Order by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Defendant filed an application to continue the mandatory scheduling conference (MSC), citing as one reason for the continuance Plaintiff's failure to respond to Defendant's repeated attempts to contact her. Plaintiff's failure to participate in the preparation and filing of a joint report violates the MSC order. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, in writing no later than 9:00 a.m. on February 28, 2024, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution in light of Plaintiff's failure to communicate. The Court SETS a hearing on the order to show cause at 8:30 a.m. on March 1. Plaintiff's failure to timely file a response to this order or appear at the hearing will be deemed consent to dismissal with prejudice. The MSC remains on calendar at the same time. The parties shall file the required Joint Rule 26(f) Report by no later than 9:00 a.m. on February 29. If Plaintiff fails to cooperate, Defendant shall file its portion of the report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 APPLICATION to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference from March 1, 2024 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #10 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anne- Marie D. Dao, #2 Exhibit A to Decl of Dao, #3 Exhibit B to Decl of Dao, #4 Exhibit C to Decl of Dao, #5 Exhibit D to Decl of Dao, #6 Exhibit E to Decl of Dao, #7 Exhibit F to Decl of Dao, #8 Exhibit G to Decl of Dao, #9 Exhibit H to Decl of Dao, #10 Proposed Order Granting Application for Continuance of Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Mandatory Scheduling Conference) (Dao, Anne-Marie) |
|
Filing 13
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO FILE OVERDUE REPORT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties failed to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by February 20, 2024, as ordered. The parties shall file their overdue report no later than 9:00 a.m. on February 23, 2024. The Court cautions the parties that their failure to file the report by the extended deadline or to comply with any future court order may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why they should not be sanctioned. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Teresa Regina Morin counsel for Defendant Tiffany and Company. Adding Teresa R. Morin as counsel of record for Defendant Tiffany and Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company. (Attorney Teresa Regina Morin added to party Tiffany and Company(pty:dft))(Morin, Teresa) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #10 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 served on February 2, 2024. (Dao, Anne-Marie) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on March 1, 2024 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by February 20, 2024. See order for details. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 9
Civil standing order upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Siyu Liu, upon Defendant Tiffany and Company served on 12/29/2023, answer due 1/19/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarai Marin, Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/4/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 100, Tiffany and Company., filed by plaintiff Siyu Liu. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/20/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on January 29, 2024. (Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company, identifying Siyu Liu, Tiffany and Company, Tiffany & Co., and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton. (Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company identifying Tiffany & Co. and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton as Corporate Parent. (Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company. (Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 23SMCV05515 Receipt No: ACACDC-36814889 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Tiffany and Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Wynter L. Deagle, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons and Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit C - All other Superior Court documents, #5 Declaration of Catherine So, #6 Exhibit A - Statement of Information Corporation, #7 Exhibit B - Final Sale Receipt, #8 Exhibit C - Statement of Delivery) (Attorney Wynter L Deagle added to party Tiffany and Company(pty:dft))(Deagle, Wynter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
