Gevorg Harutyunyan v. David Radel et al
Gevorg Harutyunyan, Shahinyan Anna, Harutyunyan Mane and Harutyunyan Mila |
MERRICK GARLAND, David M Radel, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
2:2024cv00806 |
January 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Stephen V Wilson |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Certification and Notice and Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. Other error(s) with document(s): Complaint was not uploaded as the first document to docket # 1. (et) |
Filing 3 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36819583 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Gevorg Harutyunyan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum Complaint) (Attorney Violet Dersahakian added to party Gevorg Harutyunyan(pty:pla))(Dersahakian, Violet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.