James Derek Bond v. GHPM Corporation et al
| James Derek Bond |
| GHPM Corporation, Janel Braverman, Jeff Nicklen, Raymond Young, Chris Unknown Last Name and GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION |
| 2:2024cv00826 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION #37 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: No proof of service/waiver of service on file. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. CLARIFICATION OF THE ABOVE: 1) The second amended complaint was Stricken by the court on 3/26/2024 refer to docket no. #36 ; 2) Therefore the clerk could not issue the amended summons thereto, refer to docket no. #39 . (lc) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #34 . The following error(s) was found: 1) The (second) Amended Complaint (amending amended complaint no. 21) #33 was Stricken by the Court's G112B response docket no. #36 . 2) Therefore the "amended" summons cannot be issued. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Amended Complaint #33 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The document is stricken. (smo) |
| Filing 38 DECLARATION of James Derek Bond REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION #37 filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (lc) |
| Filing 37 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION filed by plaintiff GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION. (lc) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE:(SECOND) Amended Complaint, #33 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): Per L.R. 15-1, Any proposed Second Amended Complaint must be filed as an attachment to a request for Leave/Motion to file a Second Amended Complaint. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 34 Request for Clerk to Issue AMENDED Summons on Amended Complaint, #33 filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (lc) Modified on 3/26/2024 (lc). |
| Filing 33 (STRICKEN PER 3/26/2024 THE COURT'S G112 RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 36) AMENDED COMPLAINT; AMENDED COVERSHEET; ADDENDUM against defendant Janel Braverman, Jeff Nicklen, Chris, Raymond Young, GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; Party GHPM Corporation ((3186359)) terminated amending Amended Complaint #21 , filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond(lc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2024: #1 AMENDED COVERSHEET) (lc). Modified on 3/25/2024 (lc). Modified on 3/27/2024 (lc). |
| Filing 32 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant GHPM Corporation #31 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. Request was filed 3/15/2024 but submitted to clerk to docket and process on 3/19/2024. Per 3/18/24 Minutes the Court responded to plaintiffs motion re proof of service and summons to be amended docket no. 30. As such this request is moot. Please refer to the minutes docket no. #30 . (lc) |
| Filing 30 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE:PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS #24 , #26 AND #27 . Plaintiff James Derek Bond filed two motions. 1 First, he moves to amend his proof of service. (Mot. for Leave to Am. Summons & Proof of Service, ECF Nos. 26 and 27.) The Court grants the motion to amend the proof of service. This does not mean that the Court finds that Plaintiff properly served the summons and complaint, or that the amended proof of service actually proves service. Plaintiff says in the title of his motion that he wants an amended summons, but he does not ask for an amended summons in the text of his motion, and he does not provide an amended summons form for the Clerk to issue. That part of the motion is denied, but Plaintiff may ask for an amended summons by following Local Rule 4-1. Plaintiff also filed a motion that, on its face, indicates that he seeks leave to amend his complaint, but the attached documents are papers relevant to a motion for summary judgment. (Mot. for Leave to Am., ECF No. 24; Mem. Re: Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 24-1.) The Court denies the motion but will give Plaintiff an opportunity to refile it later. Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the proof of service is granted, Plaintiffsmotion for issuance of an amended summons is denied without prejudice to renewal, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to renewal. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including unrepresented litigants. The Court has a Pro Se Clinic available to assist individuals who do not have an attorney to represent them (see document re Pro Se contact information). (lc) |
| Filing 31 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant GHPM Corporation filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (lc) |
Filing 23
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND MOTION TO DISMISS #11 #20 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court denies the motion as moot. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND #26 , Declaration (Motion related) #28 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION #27 served on 3/12/24. (rolm) |
| Filing 28 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMMEND SUMMONS AND PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (rolm) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMMEND SUMMONS AND PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (rolm) |
| Filing 26 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMMEND SUMMONS AND PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (rolm) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond, re Amended Complaint #21 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION #24 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND #20 , Declaration (Motion related) #22 served on 3/11/24. (rolm) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT FORM filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents) (rolm) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND #20 filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (rolm) |
| Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant GHPM Corporation amending Complaint - (Discovery), #1 , filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond(rolm) |
| Filing 20 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT FORM filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (rolm) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #18 , #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. 1) Defendant was named in complaint as "GHPM Corporation". 2) Summons caption and "To:" area has different name as "GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION"; 3) Summons entitle "AMENDED" summons... a format clerk cannot issue. 3) No record of filing nor order permiting change of name.. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Amended Summons on Complaint - (Discovery) AS TO GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION #1 filed by plaintiff James Derek Bond. (lc) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond, upon Defendant GHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mr. Kelly Scott, Attorney in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation and no service by mail was executed. (DATE OF SERVICE MISSING, LEFT BLANK ) (lc) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION #11 filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (lc) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant GHPM Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #13 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #14 , Request for Judicial Notice #12 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Or in the Alternative Quash Service of Summons #11 served on March 1, 2024. (Slater, Jared) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant GHPM Corporation identifying No Entity as Corporate Parent. (Slater, Jared) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GHPM Corporation, (Slater, Jared) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Or in the Alternative Quash Service of Summons #11 filed by Defendant GHPM Corporation. (Slater, Jared) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Or in the Alternative Quash Service of Summons filed by Defendant GHPM Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2024 at 03:00 PM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order) (Attorney Jared William Slater added to party GHPM Corporation(pty:dft)) (Slater, Jared) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond, upon Plaintiff GHPM Corporation served on 2/9/2024, answer due 3/1/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kelly Scott, designated to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified (lc) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (Long Form) filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Janel Braverman, GHPM Corporation, Jeff Nicklen, Chris Unknown Last Name, Raymond Young.Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff James Derek Bond. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Defendant GHPM Corporation). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
