Shawn Jenkins et al v. United States Postal Service et al
Shawn Jenkins and AIDS Healthcare Foundation |
United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and Jeremie Six |
2:2024cv00885 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Andre Birotte |
Other Statutory Actions |
39 U.S.C. ยง 409 Postal Service |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:24-cv-00885 AB(MAAx). (rn) |
Filing 12 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Process Server Kelly McKeon Confirming Service of Jeremie Six, in his official capacity as United States Postmaster of Los Angeles filed by Plaintiffs AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Shawn Jenkins (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Process Server Kelly McKeon Confirming Service of Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as United States Postmaster General filed by Plaintiffs AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Shawn Jenkins (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Process Server Kelly McKeon Confirming Service of United States Postal Service filed by Plaintiffs AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Shawn Jenkins (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
![]() |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Louis DeJoy, Jeremie Six, United States Postal Service. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Shawn Jenkins. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Shawn Jenkins, identifying Shawn Jenkins; AIDS Healthcare Foundation; United States Postal Service; Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as US Postmaster General; Jeremie Six, in his official capacity as United States Postmaster of Los Angeles. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Shawn Jenkins. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36839035 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Shawn Jenkins, AIDS Healthcare Foundation. (Attorney Jonathan Michael Eisenberg added to party AIDS Healthcare Foundation(pty:pla), Attorney Jonathan Michael Eisenberg added to party Shawn Jenkins(pty:pla))(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.