Brooke Richards v. Luv N' Care Ltd et al
| Brooke Richards |
| Luv N' Care Ltd and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv00956 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 First Amended Complaint Class Action AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Brooke Richards amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Brooke Richards(Stevens, Paul) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Luv N' Care Ltd answer now due 3/8/2024, filed by Attorney for Defendant Luv N' Care Ltd.(Fernald, Brandon) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Attorney for Defendant Luv N' Care Ltd, served on 02/08/2024. (Fernald, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Luv N' Care Ltd, identifying Luv N' Care, Ltd.. (Fernald, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings and by selecting Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71). (car) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Luv N' Care Ltd. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Brooke Richards. Filed in State Court on 1/4/2024 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Brooke Richards, upon Defendant Luv N' Care Ltd served on 1/11/2024, answer due 2/1/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joseph Hakim, Registered Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Filed in State Court on 1/12/2024 Submitted with Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STCV00273 Receipt No: ACACDC-36851144 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Luv N' Care Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Brandon C Fernald added to party Luv N' Care Ltd(pty:dft))(Fernald, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
