Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. MVP Remodeling Inc et al
Jorge Alejandro Rojas |
Yosef Vaizman, MVP Remodeling Inc, Richie Pan and Yossi Vaizman |
2:2024cv00960 |
February 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Karen E Scott |
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants MVP Remodeling Inc, Richie Pan, Yosef Vaizman. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Defendant Richie Pan, #2 Summons as to Yosef Vaizman)(lh) |
Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $405.00 from Jorge A. Rojas. Re: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . Receipt number Pay.gov Tracking Id: 27BKLOOQ. (ee) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jorge Alejandro Rojas, (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants MVP Remodeling Inc, Richie Pan, Yosef Vaizman.Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Filing Fee $405 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Jorge Alejandro Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.