Nsa Sam et al v. LAFH et al
| Nsa Sam, G. N., J. S. and Ellijah Sam |
| LAFH and Lisa Maytil |
| 2:2024cv00974 |
| February 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF SERVICE ON LAFH SERVED A SECOND TIME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR LIST OF DOCUMENTS on 3/8/2024 filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (lc) |
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUESTS #18 #20 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court denies Ms. Sam's requests. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including unrepresented litigants. The Court has a Pro Se Clinic available to assist individuals who do not have an attorney to represent them. Clinics are located in Los Angeles, Riverside, and Santa Ana. More information can be obtained by calling (213) 385-2977, ext. 270, or by visiting the Court's website, http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 22 MOTION of Dismissal filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (rolm) |
| Filing 20 REQUEST OF DISMISSAL OF CASE AND REMOVE ELLIJAH SAM AS A PLAINTIFF IMMEDIATELY filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (lc) |
| Filing 19 Notice of service of copy of complaint, copy of request for a TRO and a verbal indication of plaintiff filing a petition of dimissal to Christian Cass filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (lc) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST TO REMOVE MYSELF NSA SAM AS A PLAINTIFF filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (lc) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)or (c) filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (lc) |
| Filing 16 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #2 , REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY #4 , AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE #5 . The Court dismisses the complaint and denies Ms. Sam's pending motions and applications. Ms. Sam may file an amended complaint and amended request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including unrepresented litigants. The Court has a Pro Se Clinic available to assist individuals who do not have an attorney to represent them. Clinics are located in Los Angeles, Riverside,and Santa Ana. More information can be obtained by calling (213) 385-2977, ext.270, or by visiting the Courts website, http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov. (lc) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court finds that the party who filed the Request has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: Nsa Sam's request to proceed in forma pauperis establishes her indigence but not the indigence of the other three plaintiffs, G.N., J.S., and Elijah Sam. As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because:The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiffs must file an amended complaint and amended request to proceed in forma pauperis If the filer does not comply with these instructions within 30 days, this case will be DISMISSED without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) |
|
Filing 13
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF FACT by affiant: Nsa Sam filed by Plaintiff Nsa Sam. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST U.S. Marshall Service for Civil Packet, filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST For An Attorney filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Nsa Sam. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order Injunction and Hearing filed by plaintiffs G. N., J. S., Ellijah Sam, Nsa Sam. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants LAFH, Lisa Maytil. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Nsa Sam, Ellijah Sam, J. S., G. N. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
