Jane Doe v. PHE, Inc. et al
| Jane Doe |
| PHE, Inc. and Google LLC |
| 2:2024cv01065 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Steve Kim |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 43
SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion to Remand #31 , calendared for hearing on 4/8/2024, has been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The Court will issue a ruling after full consideration of properly submitted pleadings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 42 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #31 filed by Defendant PHE, Inc.. (Paulick, James) |
|
Filing 41
ORDER GRANTING MOTION #40 TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The Court ORDERS that Defendant PHE, Inc. may file its memorandum in opposition by Friday, 3/22/2024. (vdr)
|
| Filing 40 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file Memorandum in Opposition out-of-time UNOPPOSED filed by Defendant PHE, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Paulick, James) |
| Filing 39 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alexandra Nicole Vernon counsel for Defendant Google LLC. Adding Alexandra Vernon as counsel of record for Google LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Attorney Alexandra Nicole Vernon added to party Google LLC(pty:dft))(Vernon, Alexandra) |
| Filing 38 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #31 / Google LLC's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Benedict Y. Hur, #2 Exhibit 1 to Hur Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Hur Declaration, #4 Exhibit 3 to Hur Declaration, #5 Proposed Order)(Hur, Benedict) |
| Filing 37 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nadim Nimer Houssain counsel for Defendant Google LLC. Adding Nadim Houssain as counsel of record for Google LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Attorney Nadim Nimer Houssain added to party Google LLC(pty:dft))(Houssain, Nadim) |
| Filing 36 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael Aaron Rome counsel for Defendant Google LLC. Adding Michael Rome as counsel of record for Google LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Attorney Michael Aaron Rome added to party Google LLC(pty:dft))(Rome, Michael) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, (Haghighi, Julia) |
| Filing 34 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES #33 in Motion to Remand #31 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (jre) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe #31 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 32 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jane Doeto Order to Show Cause #28 (Haghighi, Julia) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. Motion set for hearing on 4/8/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Haghighi, Julia) |
|
Filing 30
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Memorandum in Support of Motion #29 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): (1) Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): No motion has been correctly filed. (jre)
|
| Filing 29 (DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #30 ) - MEMORANDUM in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Haghighi, Julia) Modified on 3/11/2024 (jre). |
|
Filing 28
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/11/2024 AS TO PHE, Inc. (jre)
|
|
Filing 27
SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge R. Gary Klausner re: The Court will defer ruling on the Order to Show Cause #25 until the Motion to Remand (to be filed) is decided. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 26 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jane Doeto Order to Show Cause, #25 (Coulson, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 25
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Pseudonymous Plaintiff by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to Show CAUSE IN WRITING by March 8, 2024 why she should be permitted to proceed by pseudonym. Plaintiff's response shall be no more than ten (10) pages in length. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 24 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jane Doeto Order to Show Cause, #17 (Coulson, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and SEt Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #22 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The Court orders as follows: (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Remand Due: 3/8/2024; (2) Plaintiffs Motion shall be calendared for a hearing date based on the timing set forth in the Court's Standing Order; (3) Defendants' Oppositions and Plaintiffs Reply shall be due based on the hearing date in accordance with the Local Rules; (4) If the Court denies Plaintiffs Motion, Defendants' Responses to Plaintiffs Complaint shall be due 21 days after the Court issues its Order. (jp)
|
| Filing 22 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 30 days after the Court issues an order on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hur, Benedict) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Google LLCto Order to Show Cause #18 (Joint Response) (Hur, Benedict) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge R. Gary Klausner GRANTING #16 Non-Resident Attorney Julia G Haghighi APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe, designating Arnold C Wang as local counsel. (jp)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge R. Gary Klausner GRANTING #12 Non-Resident Attorney Nicholas A Coulson APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, designating Arnold C Wang as local counsel. (jp)
|
|
Filing 18
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/20/2024 AND 2/22/2024. (RE: ANS OF GOOGLE, LLC) (jre)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Pseudonymous Plaintiff by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING by February 21, 2024 why she should be permitted to proceed by pseudonym. Plaintiff's response shall be no more than ten (10) pages in length. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Julia G. Haghighi to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36914263) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wang, Arnold) |
|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:23-cv-08021 RGK(SKx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-01065 RGK(SKx). Signed by Judge R. Gary Klausner (rn)
|
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nicholas A. Coulson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36910187) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wang, Arnold) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant PHE, Inc., identifying PHE INC.. (Paulick, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney James Paulick on behalf of Defendant PHE, Inc. (Attorney James Paulick added to party PHE, Inc.(pty:dft))(Paulick, James) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Julia G. Haghighi. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Nicholas A. Coulson. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, upon Defendant Google LLC served on 1/8/2024, answer due 1/29/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Registered Agent, by serving Rebecca Vang - Authorized Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Filed in State Court on 1/12/2024 Submitted with Exhibit 2 Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Google LLC, PHE, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. Filed in State Court on 1/3/2024 Submitted with Exhibit 1 Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #3 served on February 7, 2024. (Hur, Benedict) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Google LLC, identifying Google LLC; XXVI Holdings Inc., Holding Company of Google LLC; and Alphabet Inc., Holding Company of XXVI Holding Inc.. (Hur, Benedict) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Google LLC. Related Case(s): 2:23-cv-08021-RGK-SK (Hur, Benedict) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Hur, Benedict) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 24STCV00181 Receipt No: ACACDC-36877539 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Google LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Proof of Service of Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Summons, #4 Exhibit 4 - Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit 5 - Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit 6 - Other Documents on LA Docket) (Attorney Benedict Yung Hur added to party Google LLC(pty:dft))(Hur, Benedict) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
