Martha Moya v. WalMart Associates Inc. et al
Martha Moya |
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Walmart Associates Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive |
2:2024cv01117 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Alka Sagar |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 5/24/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On March 13, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on March 15, 2024. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Walmart Associates Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C)(Shihabi, Mohammad) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: It appears a response from defendant(s) has not been filed. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 3/27/2024 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff(s)/defendant(s) response. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
Filing 9 Notice of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1446 (d) filed by Defendant Walmart Associates Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Shihabi, Mohammad) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Walmart Associates Inc.Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Martha Moya.[FILED IN STATE COURT 12/22/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. identifying Walmart Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Shihabi, Mohammad) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Mohammad B. Shihabi re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Shihabi, Mohammad) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Shihabi, Mohammad) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23CMCV02069 Receipt No: ACACDC-36887767 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents) (Attorney Mohammad B Shihabi added to party Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shihabi, Mohammad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.