Melanie Delapaz v. Madrona Carwash, Inc. et al
| Melanie Delapaz |
| Madrona Carwash, Inc., 3405 Sepulveda, LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv01200 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than April 19, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Melanie Delapaz, upon Defendant Madrona Carwash, Inc. served on 3/19/2024, answer due 4/9/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon SUNIL A. BRAHMBHATT, ESQ, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re ORDER DECLIING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: For the foregoing reasons, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismisses Plaintiff's state law causes of action (claims tow through five). (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Melanie Delapazto Order to Show Cause,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause within 14 days of this order. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 3405 Sepulveda, LLC, Madrona Carwash, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Melanie Delapaz. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Melanie Delapaz. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36909065 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Melanie Delapaz(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
