Dakota Rose Labella v. Martin O Malley
| Dakota Rose Labella |
| Martin O Malley |
| 2:2024cv01211 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:24-cv-01211 SK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #7 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #9 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Dakota Rose Labella. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 8
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (rolm)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O Malley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin O Malley (pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dakota Rose Labella, (Perales, Monica) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dakota Rose Labella. (Perales, Monica) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Dakota Rose Labella. (Perales, Monica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Dakota Rose Labella. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Dakota Rose Labella (pty:pla))(Perales, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dakota Rose Labella v. Martin O Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dakota Rose Labella | |
| Represented By: | Monica Perales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin O Malley | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Michael K Marriott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
