He Liu v. David M. Radel
| He Liu |
| David M. Radel |
| 2:2024cv01225 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Adjudication of Application submitted by the parties, and finding good cause therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant action shall be stayed until July 29, 2025. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (aco)
|
| Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Plaintiff's Application filed by Defendant David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Christopher B. Buchanan added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Buchanan, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff He Liu, upon Defendant David M. Radel served on 3/1/2024, answer due 4/30/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childress, Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to name unreadable. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Los Angeles Asylum Office. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (aco) |
|
Filing 6
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant David M. Radel. (car) Modified on 2/16/2024 (car). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff He Liu (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants David M. Radel. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(Filing fee $ 405 PAID), filed by Plaintiff He Liu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: He Liu v. David M. Radel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: He Liu | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David M. Radel | |
| Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
| Represented By: | Oil Appellate |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Buchanan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
