Ruben Lopez-Garcia v. Martin O Malley
Ruben Lopez-Garcia |
Martin O Malley |
2:2024cv01251 |
February 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Mark C Scarsi |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:24-cv-01251-JC on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #7 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #10 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (aco) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O Malley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin O Malley (pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 8 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (rolm) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Ruben Lopez-Garcia. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ruben Lopez-Garcia, (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ruben Lopez-Garcia, (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ruben Lopez-Garcia. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ruben Lopez-Garcia. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Ruben Lopez-Garcia. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Ruben Lopez-Garcia(pty:pla))(Perales, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ruben Lopez-Garcia v. Martin O Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ruben Lopez-Garcia | |
Represented By: | Monica Perales |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin O Malley | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Michael K Marriott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.