Christine Thompson v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al
| Christine Thompson |
| Porsche Cars North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv01256 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR April 19, 2024, 10:30 A.M., COURTROOM 8A, FIRST STREET COURTHOUSE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Judge Staton's Procedures web page is incorporated in this Order. The parties and counsel are ORDERED to review and comply with those procedures and notices, which may be accessed at: http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-josephine-l-staton This case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON by Judge Josephine L. Staton. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Josephine L. Staton. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of this litigation in federal court. To "secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of this case, as called for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, all parties or their counsel are ordered to become familiar with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, and this Court's Orders. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Porsche Cars North America, Inc..(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-01256-JLS-MAAx. (aco)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Christine Thompson. Filed in State Court on 1/29/2024 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc. identifying Porsche Cars North America, Inc as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 24SMCV00446 Receipt No: ACACDC-36920554 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A- Thompson - Complaint_Redacted, #2 Exhibit Ex. B- Thompson Lease Contract_Redacted) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
