Joshua Cuevas v. 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC
| Joshua Cuevas |
| 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC and DOES 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv01282 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC answer now due 4/19/2024, filed by Attorney for Defendant 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC.(Attorney Dan Tudor Danet added to party 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC(pty:dft))(Danet, Dan) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevas, upon Defendant 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/20/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bernard Babcock II - (Authorized Agent for Service of Process) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 14
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court dismisses the state law claims without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevasto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Order to Show Cause,,, #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Courtshould exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, Health & Safety Code, and Negligence claims. Plaintiff shall flle a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 3/1/2024. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, Health & Safety Code, and negligence claims and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (gga) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (gga)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant 301 N. Brand Boulevard, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Joshua Cuevas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joshua Cuevas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36925768 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Joshua Cuevas(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
