Luz Zendejas v. R. A. Events Inc. et al
| Luz Zendejas |
| R. A. Events Inc. doing business as Rental Avenue, Ralph Slotnick and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv01283 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Luz Zendejas. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 16
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Having considered the Notice of Settlement #15 and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS: 1. All deadlines governing this action are VACATED. 2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 60 days from the date of this Order. 3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require approvalof the court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Luz Zendejas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/4/2024. (tf)
|
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luz Zendejas, upon Defendant Ralph Slotnick served on 3/4/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ralph Slotnick - Trustee, defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Luz Zendejas, upon Defendant R. A. Events Inc. served on 3/1/2024, answer due 3/22/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon SeanRamann - Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants R. A. Events Inc., Ralph Slotnick. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Luz Zendejas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Luz Zendejas. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-36926047 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Luz Zendejas(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
