Michael Jeremy Ezer v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Michael Jeremy Ezer
Defendant: Porsche Cars North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2024cv01290
Filed: February 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement filed on March 7, 2024 #13 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before May 7, 2024. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until May 7, 2024. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
March 7, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Michael Jeremy Ezer. (Zhang, Nancy)
March 7, 2024 Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nancy Zhang counsel for Plaintiff Michael Jeremy Ezer. Adding Nancy Zhang as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Michael Jeremy Ezer for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Michael Jeremy Ezer. (Zhang, Nancy)
February 22, 2024 Filing 10 DECLARATION of Soheyl Tahsildoost LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
February 22, 2024 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Porsche Cars North America, Inc..(Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 25, 2024 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before March 8, 2024. (iv)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
February 21, 2024 Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 50, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 20, 2024 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
February 20, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
February 20, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh)
February 15, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Michael Jeremy Ezer. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 1/9/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
February 15, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc., identifying Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
February 15, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl)
February 15, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 24STCV00560 Receipt No: ACACDC-36928020 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A- Ezer - Complaint_Redacted, #2 Exhibit Ex. B- lease agreement) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Jeremy Ezer v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Jeremy Ezer
Represented By: Nancy Zhang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
Represented By: Soheyl Tahsildoost
Represented By: Nathaniel Russell Cowden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?