M.M. v. Antelope Valley Union High School District et al
| M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin and M. M. |
| Antelope Valley Union High School District, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Does 1 through 10 inclusive |
| 2:2024cv01338 |
| February 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 15] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, re Stipulation #15 : The Court, having considered the Parties' Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint by May 2, 2024. 2. Defendant shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint by May 23, 2024. 3. Should Plaintiff fail to file a First Amended Complaint by May 2, 2024, Defendant shall file a response to the original Complaint by May 16, 2024. 4. By entering into this Stipulation, Defendant does not waive to right to move to dismiss as to the Complaint or First Amended Complaint. (bm)
|
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Katrina Joy Valencia counsel for Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District. Adding Katrina J. Valencia as counsel of record for Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District. (Attorney Katrina Joy Valencia added to party Antelope Valley Union High School District(pty:dft))(Valencia, Katrina) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION for Order TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rynerson, Alexander) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 28 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) [ECFNO. #13 ] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court, having considered the Parties Stipulation and finding good causetherefor, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: Defendant, ANTELOPE VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, shall file its responsive pleading no later than April 2, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Antelope Valley Union High School District answer now due 4/2/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Alexander Seanon Rynerson added to party Antelope Valley Union High School District(pty:dft))(Rynerson, Alexander) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: This matter has been assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's website under Judge Frimpong's Procedures and Schedules. Please read the Standing Order carefully. It is the responsibilities of the parties to maintain familiarly with the Standing Order and any future amendments that the Court may issue by periodically checking the Court's website for the operative version of the Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lfa) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff M. M., upon Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District served on 2/27/2024, answer due 3/19/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daniel Ramos / Director of HR in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Neal, Na'Shaun) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued on Complaint #1 as to Defendant Antelope Valley Union High School District. (yl) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff M. M.. (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin. (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin, (Attorney Peter Laurence Carr, IV added to party M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin(pty:pla))(Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin. (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36938056 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin. (Attorney Lauren Khali McRae added to party M.M., through her guardian ad litem, Tiffaney Ficklin(pty:pla))(McRae, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
