Albert Lee Mitchell v. Brian Birkholz
| 2:2024cv01415 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING ACTIONS by Judge John W. Holcomb. Both habeas actions are DISMISSED without prejudice under Rule 41 and the parallel Local Rule. (see document for further details) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court should not have to guess about the status of Petitioner's location, actions, and claims. Therefore, he is ORDERED to show cause why both of his pending federal court cases should not be dismissed as moot. Petitioner's response (not to exceed five pages) will be due by April 19. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Albert Lee Mitchell v. Brian Birkholz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
