Southern California Edison Company v. Old Republic General Insurance Company et al
| Southern California Edison Company |
| Old Republic General Insurance Company, Navigator Specialty Insurance Company and Endurance American Specialty Insurance |
| 2:2024cv01419 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jeffrey S Renzi counsel for Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. Adding Jeffrey S. Renzi as counsel of record for Southern California Edison Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Attorney Jeffrey S Renzi added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:pla))(Renzi, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jennifer Bunn Hayden counsel for Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. Adding Jennifer B. Hayden as counsel of record for Southern California Edison Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Attorney Jennifer Bunn Hayden added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:pla))(Hayden, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (hc) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Endurance American Specialty Insurance, Navigator Specialty Insurance Company, Old Republic General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Defendant Navigator Specialty Insurance Company, #2 Summons as to Defendant Endurance American Specialty Insurance) (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Thomas Connor O'Carroll counsel for Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. Adding Thomas Connor O'Carroll as counsel of record for Southern California Edison Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Attorney Thomas Connor O'Carroll added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:pla))(O'Carroll, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Navigator Specialty Insurance Company, #2 Summons - Endurance American Specialty Insurance)(Finch, Amber) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company, identifying Edison International. (Finch, Amber) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Finch, Amber) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36953170 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Attorney Amber S Finch added to party Southern California Edison Company(pty:pla))(Finch, Amber) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
