John M. Manley v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff: John M Manley
Defendant: U.S. Customs & Border Protection and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Case Number: 2:2024cv01427
Filed: February 21, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: John A Kronstadt
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER RE STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (DKT. #12 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Based on a review of the Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (the "Stipulation" (Dkt. 12)), sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the Stipulation is APPROVED, as follows: Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall have to and including June 24, 2024, within which to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Complaint. (yl)
April 10, 2024 Filing 12 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 24, 2024 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Farrell, Alexander)
March 13, 2024 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to U.S. Customs and Border Protection answer now due 4/23/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection.(Attorney Alexander Layne Farrell added to party U.S. Customs and Border Protection(pty:dft))(Farrell, Alexander)
March 4, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff John M Manley. correcting Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Corrected Certificate of Service)(Vakili, Bardis)
March 4, 2024 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John M Manley, upon Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection served on 2/26/2024, answer due 4/26/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to U.S. Attorney General's Office. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Chief Counsel, CBP. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Vakili, Bardis)
February 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
February 23, 2024 Filing 7 30 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (sh)
February 23, 2024 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
February 23, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
February 23, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh)
February 21, 2024 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John M Manley, (Vakili, Bardis)
February 21, 2024 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John M Manley. (Vakili, Bardis)
February 21, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36953557 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff John M Manley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Bardis Vakili added to party John M Manley(pty:pla))(Vakili, Bardis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John M. Manley v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M Manley
Represented By: Bardis Vakili
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Customs & Border Protection
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Represented By: Alexander Layne Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?