Nicole Sullivan v. County of Los Angeles et al
| NICOLE SULLIVAN |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DETECTIVE MIGUEL JIMENEZ-RAMIREZ, SERGEANT JOSE J. ROJAS, DEPUTY HEATHER N. CORNEA, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department and Does 1 through 15, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv01469 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, re Notice (Other) #4 served on February 22, 2024. (Foster, Danielle) |
| Filing 4 Notice TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Foster, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, (Foster, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Foster, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 24STCV00112 Receipt No: ACACDC-36959976 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Danielle C Foster added to party COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:dft))(Foster, Danielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
