Marquis Bailey v. Trinity Thrift Incorporated
| Marquise Bailey |
| Trinity Thrift Incorporated and DOES 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv01471 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Marquise Bailey. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marquise Bailey, upon Defendant Trinity Thrift Incorporated served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon SHELLY R. ABRAHAMS, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 13
ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Accordingly, the Court exercises its discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim, and that claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Marquise Baileyto Order to Show Cause,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 11 On March 1, 2024, the Court updated its standing orders, including the Civil Standing Order, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Order, the Motion for Summary Judgment Order, and the Civil Pretrial and Trial Order. The parties are directed to read and, where possible (e.g., on any summary judgment motion for which the parties have not yet exchanged papers), comply with these updated standing orders, which can be found on Judge Blumenfeld's webpage. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff within 14 days after entry of this Order to show cause in writing why the Court should not dismiss without prejudice his Unruh Act claim under Section 1367(c)(4). If Plaintiff fails to file a response within 14 days after entry of this Order, the Court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim, and the Unruh Act claim will be automatically dismissed without prejudice without further order of the Court. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Trinity Thrift Incorporated. (jtil) |
|
Filing 8
Civil standing order upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Marquise Bailey. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marquise Bailey. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36960042 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Marquise Bailey(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
