Te Li v. David M. Radel
| Te Li |
| David M. Radel |
| 2:2024cv01492 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Alka Sagar |
| George H Wu |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing In Person, re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 , , First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 6/3/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 filed by Defendant David M. Radel. Motion set for hearing on 5/20/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Declaration, #3 Memorandum, #4 Proposed Order) (Attorney Christopher B. Buchanan added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft)) (Buchanan, Christopher) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dta)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge George H Wu. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge George H Wu to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-01492 DSF(ASx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Te Li, upon Defendant David M. Radel served on 2/23/2024, answer due 4/23/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney in Los Angeles. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Copy of U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail Return receipt attached. Original Summon Return attached. (jp) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Te Li, upon Defendant David M. Radel served on 2/23/2024, answer due 4/23/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Director of Asylum Office in Los Angeles. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Copy of U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail Return attached. Original Summon Return attached. (jp) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant David M. Radel. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Te Li. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Te Li against Defendant David M. Radel. Case assigned to Judge George H Wu for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Filing fee $ 405 Paid.) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Te Li v. David M. Radel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Te Li | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David M. Radel | |
| Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
| Represented By: | Oil Appellate |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Buchanan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
