Alvaro Orosco v. South Coast Deli Inc. et al
| Alvaro Orosco |
| South Coast Deli, Inc., Levon Investments, LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv01527 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION [DKT. 17] by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The court hereby ORDERS: The court DISMISSES the action with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Alvaro Orosco. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 16 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Levon Investments, LLC answer now due 5/8/2024, filed by Defendant Levon Investments, LLC.(Attorney Rachel E. Thomas added to party Levon Investments, LLC(pty:dft))(Thomas, Rachel) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alvaro Orosco, upon Defendant South Coast Deli, Inc. served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon James S St. John - Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Alvaro Oroscoto Order to Show Cause #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alvaro Orosco, upon Defendant Levon Investments, LLC served on 3/11/2024, answer due 4/1/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kenneth P. Slaught - Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/14/2024. (tf)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Levon Investments, LLC, South Coast Deli, Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Alvaro Orosco. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Alvaro Orosco. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36969959 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Alvaro Orosco(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
