Larry Dunn v. Santo's Tailor Shop & Dry Cleaning et al
Larry Dunn |
Santo's Tailor Shop & Dry Cleaning, Massachusetts, LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2024cv01595 |
February 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Margo A Rocconi |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Larry Dunn. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 16 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: On April 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed Notice of Settlement filed at docket #15 . The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for May 8, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. If the parties file a dismissal by May 6, 2024, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance by counsel will be required. All pending dates are vacated. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Larry Dunn. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 14 ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (iv) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Larry Dunn, upon Defendant Santo's Tailor Shop & Dry Cleaning served on 3/15/2024, answer due 4/5/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Santos Perez - Owner (Authorized Person To Accept Service of Process) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Larry Dunnto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause within fourteen (14) days of this order. (iv) |
Filing 10 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The court finds that good cause exists to institute a limited scheduling order for cases under the ADA involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. (iv) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Massachusetts, LLC, Santo's Tailor Shop & Dry Cleaning. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Larry Dunn. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Larry Dunn. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36987567 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Larry Dunn(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.