Miltita Casillas et al v. Hanesbrands Inc.
| Hanesbrands Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as www.maidenform.com |
| Miltita Casillas and Hanesbrands Inc. |
| 2:2024cv01641 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp) |
| Filing 26 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case number: 24STCV01291. (jp) |
| Filing 24 REPLY IN SUPPORT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #12 filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Lally, Amy) |
Filing 25
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order Remanding Action to State Court by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds the $75,000 jurisdictional minimum. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to state court for all further proceedings. All pending dates on the docket of this court are taken off calendar. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION OPPOSITION TO re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 (CORRECTED) filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Lally, Amy) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #20 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Other error(s) with document(s): Document contains single spaced text in violation of L.R. 11-3.6. Counsel may file a corrected document within 2 days from the date of this order. (jre)
|
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #12 filed by Plaintiff Miltita Casillas. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 1 to RJN, #3 Exhibit 2 to RJN, #4 Proposed Order)(Ferrell, Scott) |
| Filing 20 (DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #22 ) - OPPOSITION TO re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Lally, Amy) Modified on 3/20/2024 (jre). |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Change of address by Anna Tutundjian attorney for Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. Changing attorneys address to 350 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071. Filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Tutundjian, Anna) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Miltita Casillas, (Ferrell, Scott) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (jre) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case filed by Plaintiff Miltita Casillas #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.to Order to Show Cause, #11 (Attachments: #1 Hanesbrands Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit A (Form CM-010), #3 Exhibit B (Knowles Decl.))(Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Miltita Casillas. Motion set for hearing on 4/8/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Ferrell, Scott) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/15/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by DEFENDANT Hanesbrands Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/8/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lally, Amy) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Amount in Controversy [DE #1 ] by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court ORDERS Defendant to show cause in writing why the jurisdictional requirements are or are not satisfied. Such a response shall not exceed five pages and must be submitted within six days of this Order's issuance. (jp)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Hanesbrands Inc. answer now due 4/4/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Amy P. Lally In Support of Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer, Move, Or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint By Less Than Thirty (30) Days, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Extending Time for Defendant to Answer, Move, Or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint By Less Than Thirty (30) Days)(Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Miltita Casillas in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/28/2024, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc., re Notice (Other) #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on February 28, 2024. (Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 4 Notice filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. Proof of Filing of Notice to Superior Court and Adverse Party of Removal of Action to Federal Court (Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc., identifying BlackRock, Inc.. (Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Lally, Amy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STCV01291 Receipt No: ACACDC-36997908 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Hanesbrands Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy P. Lally, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit C - Summons, #5 Exhibit D - Proof of Personal Service, #6 Exhibit E - Alternative Dispute Resolution Packet, #7 Exhibit F - First Amended General Order, #8 Exhibit G - Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulation Packet, #9 Exhibit H - Notice of Case Assignment, #10 Exhibit I - Peremptory Challenge to Judicial Officer, #11 Exhibit J - Minute Order, #12 Exhibit K - Notice of Case Management Conference_1-18-2024, #13 Exhibit L - Notice of Case Management Conference_2-2-2024, #14 Exhibit M - Notice of Case Reassignment, #15 Exhibit N - Hanesbrands North Carolina Secretary of State Search Results) (Attorney Amy P. Lally added to party Hanesbrands Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Lally, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
