Salvatore Spina v. Keenan and Associates
| Salvatore Spina |
| Keenan & Associates and Keenan and Associates |
| 2:2024cv01699 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Keenan and Associates, regarding Rutledge v. Keenan & Associates, Case No. 5:24-cv-00263 Minute Order [Dkt 48] served on 4/10/2024. (Billeci, Matthew) |
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles E. Schaffer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Salvatore Spina and designating John J. Nelson as local counsel #13 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles E. Schaffer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Salvatore Spina (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37148590) filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Spina. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Nelson, John) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey S. Goldenberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Salvatore Spina and designating John J. Nelson as local counsel #11 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey S. Goldenberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Salvatore Spina (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37093936) filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Spina. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Nelson, John) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:24-cv-00263 MCS(DTBx). Case transferred from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-01699 MCS(DTBx). Signed by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (rn)
|
| Filing 8 Keenan & Associates WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Salvatore Spina. upon Keenan and Associates waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/4/2024, answer due 5/3/2024. Waiver of Service signed by John A. Vogt. (Nelson, John) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Keenan and Associates. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Salvatore Spina. (Nelson, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Spina, (Nelson, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Spina. (Nelson, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37015210 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Salvatore Spina. (Attorney John J. Nelson added to party Salvatore Spina(pty:pla))(Nelson, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
