Xochilt Rosas et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Xochilt Rosas and Jonathan Lested |
| County of Los Angeles and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 2:2024cv01710 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Ridenhour, Kelsey) |
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some requests from the Local Rules. See order for details. (ys)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:24-cv-01710 CBM(JCx). (rn) |
| Filing 16 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Lested, Xochilt Rosas. (Karen, Connor) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (et) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 4/26/2024, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Ridenhour, Kelsey) |
| Filing 13 Notice Notice of Interested Parties Local Rule 7.1-1 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Ridenhour, Kelsey) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kelsey F. Ridenhour counsel for Defendant County of Los Angeles. Adding Kelsey F. Ridenhour as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attorney Kelsey F. Ridenhour added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Ridenhour, Kelsey) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elizabeth Tom Arce counsel for Defendant County of Los Angeles. Adding Elizabeth T. Arce as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Couty of Los Angeles. (Attorney Elizabeth Tom Arce added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Arce, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Xochilt Rosas, Jonathan Lested, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 3/6/2024, answer due 3/27/2024; Does served on 3/6/2024, answer due 3/27/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Karen, Connor) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar #4 under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (afe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 8 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiffs Jonathan Lested, Xochilt Rosas (Karen, Connor) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Karen, Connor) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant County of Los Angeles. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plantiffs Jonathan Lested, Xochilt Rosas. (Karen, Connor) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Jonathan Lested, Xochilt Rosas. (Karen, Connor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-37016783 - Fee: $405, filed by Plantiffs Xochilt Rosas, Jonathan Lested. (Attorney Connor M Karen added to party Jonathan Lested(pty:pla), Attorney Connor M Karen added to party Xochilt Rosas(pty:pla))(Karen, Connor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
