Clifton Walker v. Snyder-Diamond et al
| Clifton Walker |
| Snyder-Diamond, SDSM, LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv01774 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants SDSM, LLC, Snyder-Diamond. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Clifton Walker. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 5 * PER NOTICE OF ERRATA SEE DOCKET ENTRY #5 * COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37033933 - Fee: $405.(Kim, Jason) Modified on 3/5/2024 (et). |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Clifton Walker. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Clifton Walker. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37033662 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Clifton Walker(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
