Baharak Kakavand v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Baharak Kakavand |
| Ur M. Jaddou, Robert Sanders and Merrick B. Garland |
| 2:2024cv01795 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Application for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Robert Sanders. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff BAHARAK KAKAVAND. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff BAHARAK KAKAVAND, identifying None. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BAHARAK KAKAVAND. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37039746 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff BAHARAK KAKAVAND. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Jennifer Rozdzielski added to party BAHARAK KAKAVAND(pty:pla))(Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
