Raymond Flores v. Tesla Inc.
Raymond Flores |
Tesla Inc a Delaware Corporation doing business as Tesla Motors Inc. |
2:2024cv01828 |
March 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Wesley L Hsu |
Rozella A Oliver |
Hernan D Vera |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME AND RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR TESLA'S MOTION TO DISMISS (L.R. 8-3) #24 by Judge Hernan D. Vera. The Court hereby orders the following briefing schedule and hearing date with respect to Tesla's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. #22 ): May 31, 2024 - Deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Tesla's Motion; June 21, 2024 - Deadline for Tesla to file a reply; July 18, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. - Hearing on Tesla's Motion to Dismiss. (lom) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply, STIPULATION to Reset Briefing Schedule filed by Plaintiff Raymond Flores. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Extend Time and Reset Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Tesla's Motion to Dismiss (L.R. 8-3))(Zohdy, Tarek) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nathan N. Kiyam on behalf of Plaintiff Raymond Flores (Attorney Nathan N. Kiyam added to party Raymond Flores(pty:pla))(Kiyam, Nathan) |
Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1), Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 9(b), And Memorandum of Points And Authorities filed by Defendant Tesla Inc. Motion set for hearing on 5/16/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Hernan D. Vera. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David L. Schrader and Exhibits A-K, #2 Request for Judicial Notice of Exs. A-K, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Schrader, David) |
Filing 21 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (dta) |
Filing 20 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:23-cv-09665 HDV(RAOx). Case transferred from Judge Wesley L. Hsu to Judge Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-01828 HDV(RAOx). Signed by Judge Hernan D. Vera (rn) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Tesla Inc. Related Case(s): 23-cv-09665 and 24-cv-01727 (Schrader, David) |
Filing 18 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (hc) |
Filing 17 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (sh) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 1:23-cv-01735-CDB, from Eastern District of California. The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:24-cv-01828 WLH (RAOx). (sh) |
Filing 13 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern |
Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER TRANSFERRING Action to the Central District of California; ORDER EXTENDING Deadline for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 3/1/2024.(Sant Agata, S) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for to Transfer Action to the Central District of California Due to Earlier-Filed Related Action by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in Reynolds Action, #2 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation)(Schrader, David) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Tesla, Inc.. (Schrader, David) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry), signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 1/24/2024: In light of the parties' stipulation to extend Defendant's time to file a responsive pleading through March 19, 2023 (Doc. #8 ), the scheduling conference set for March 13, 2024 (Doc. #3 ) is HEREBY CONTINUED to April 10, 2024, at 9:00 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Hall, S) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Tesla To Respond to the Complaint (L.R. 144(a)) by Tesla, Inc.. Attorney Schrader, David L added. (Schrader, David) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry), signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 1/16/2024: For good cause shown through the representations of counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. #6 ) in response to the Court's show cause order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. #4 ) is DISCHARGED. (Hall, S) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Raymond Flores. (Goolsby, Laura) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Tesla, Inc. on 12/21/2023, Answer due 2/20/2024 (Zohdy, Tarek) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE in Writing Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 12/21/2023. Show Cause Response due within 21 days. (Hall, S) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2024 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Tesla, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tarek H. Zohdy* *Capstone Law APC* *1875 Century Park East, Suite 1000* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Marrujo, C) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tesla, Inc. by Raymond Flores. Attorney Zohdy, Tarek H. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11247655) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zohdy, Tarek) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/7/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Raymond Flores v. Tesla Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Raymond Flores | |
Represented By: | Tarek H. Zohdy |
Represented By: | Cody Robert Padgett |
Represented By: | Laura Ellen Goolsby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Tesla Inc a Delaware Corporation doing business as Tesla Motors Inc. | |
Represented By: | David L Schrader |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.