Kelly Ann Willard v. Martin O Malley
Plaintiff: Kelly Ann Willard
Defendant: Martin O Malley
Case Number: 2:2024cv01877
Filed: March 7, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: Sunshine Suzanne Sykes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:24-cv-01877 SK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn)
March 18, 2024 Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O Malley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin O Malley (pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
March 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (NON-PRISONER CASE). (twdb)
March 9, 2024 Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Kelly Ann Willard. (Ver Planck, Mark)
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: This case is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actionsunder 42 U.S.C. 405(g), effective December 1, 2022. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et)
March 8, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et)
March 7, 2024 Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security. (Ver Planck, Mark)
March 7, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, (Ver Planck, Mark)
March 7, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security. (Ver Planck, Mark)
March 7, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Fee Agreement - Federal Court) (Attorney Mark Ver Planck added to party Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Ver Planck, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly Ann Willard v. Martin O Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Ann Willard
Represented By: Mark Ver Planck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O Malley
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Michael K Marriott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?