Juan Padrone Chavez v. Jimmy Gomez et al
| Juan Padrone Chavez |
| Jimmy Gomez, Govening Local Body, Dispute Resolution Program and LAPD |
| 2:2024cv02052 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Juan Padrone Chavez. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Juan Padrone Chavez. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Dispute Resolution Program, Jimmy Gomez, Govening Local Body, LAPD. Case assigned to Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner., filed by Plaintiff Juan Padrone Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
