Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. |
Northrop Grumman Corporation and DOES 1-10 |
2:2024cv02114 |
March 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jordan C. Hilton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37099501) filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on March 14, 2024. (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STLC00374 Receipt No: ACACDC-37098868 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Douglas A. Smith in Support) (Attorney Douglas Allen Smith added to party Northrop Grumman Corporation(pty:dft))(Smith, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.