Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al

Plaintiff: Keith Feder, M.D., Inc.
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation and DOES 1-10
Case Number: 2:2024cv02114
Filed: March 14, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: A Joel Richlin
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2024 Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING Joint to Extend Defendant Deadline to Respond to Complaint (Doc. #13 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton, as follows: Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation shall have until Thursday, 6/6/2024, to respond to the Complaint. (jp)
April 15, 2024 Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 06/06/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Douglas)
March 20, 2024 Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (jp)
March 18, 2024 Filing 11 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges.by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:24-cv-02114 JLS(AJRx). (rn)
March 18, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jordan C. Hilton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37099501) #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number incomplete; missing initials of Judge. Application not dated. Remove 'click here' verbiage from proposed order. (ak)
March 18, 2024 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Northrop Grumman Corporation answer now due 4/22/2024, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation.(Smith, Douglas)
March 18, 2024 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
March 18, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
March 18, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (ghap)
March 14, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Keith Feder, M.D., Inc., upon Plaintiff Northrop Grumman Corporation served on 2/13/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Monitjo, Authorized To Accept Service Of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/14/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap)
March 14, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Northrop Grumman Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/19/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap)
March 14, 2024 Filing 5 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jordan C. Hilton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37099501) filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Douglas)
March 14, 2024 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on March 14, 2024. (Smith, Douglas)
March 14, 2024 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, (Smith, Douglas)
March 14, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Smith, Douglas)
March 14, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STLC00374 Receipt No: ACACDC-37098868 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Douglas A. Smith in Support) (Attorney Douglas Allen Smith added to party Northrop Grumman Corporation(pty:dft))(Smith, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Feder, M.D., Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation
Represented By: Douglas Allen Smith
Represented By: Jordan C. Hilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?