Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. |
Northrop Grumman Corporation and DOES 1-10 |
2:2024cv02114 |
March 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
A Joel Richlin |
Josephine L Staton |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 06/06/2024 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (jp) |
|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jordan C. Hilton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37099501) #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number incomplete; missing initials of Judge. Application not dated. Remove 'click here' verbiage from proposed order. (ak) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Northrop Grumman Corporation answer now due 4/22/2024, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation.(Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Keith Feder, M.D., Inc., upon Plaintiff Northrop Grumman Corporation served on 2/13/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Monitjo, Authorized To Accept Service Of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/14/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Northrop Grumman Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/19/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jordan C. Hilton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37099501) filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on March 14, 2024. (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Smith, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 24STLC00374 Receipt No: ACACDC-37098868 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Douglas A. Smith in Support) (Attorney Douglas Allen Smith added to party Northrop Grumman Corporation(pty:dft))(Smith, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.