Rene Lopez v. Parker Hannifin Filtration et al
Parker Hannfin Corporation |
Rene Lopez, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Parker Hannifin Filtration LLC, Doe and Does 2 through 20, inclusive |
2:2024cv02490 |
March 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Hernan D Vera |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation.. (King, Phoebe) |
Filing 15 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rene Lopez, (Nalbandyan, Akop) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #10 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #11 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 served on March 28, 2024. (King, Phoebe) |
Filing 13 Scheduling Conference set for 6/4/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Hernan D. Vera. (dta) |
Filing 12 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (dta) |
Filing 11 Corrected Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 10 CORRECTED NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the incorrect case information is reflected in forms issued. Docket item #6 and docket item #7 should be disregarded. Corrected Forms will be issued. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): The Role of the Parties was reversed at case opening. Plaintiff Rene Lopez was noted as Defendant and Defendant was noted as Plaintiff. The Clerk will make the corrections to the docket. (car) |
Filing 7 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 3/27/2024, SEE ITEM 9]] Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 3/27/2024, SEE ITEM 9]]NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, Inclusive, Parker Hannifin Filtration. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Rene Lopez. Filed in State Court on 12/5/2023 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
CONFORMED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Rene Lopez pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Parker Hannifin Filtration LLC Without prejudice. Filed in State Court on 2/7/2024 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 9 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT as to Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Rene Lopez. Upon the filing of the complaint, the plaintiff being ignorant of the true name of the defendant and having designated the defendant in the complaint by the fictitious name of Doe 1 and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be: Parker Hannifin Corporation. Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 10 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Rene Lopez, upon Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 2/14/2024, answer due 3/6/2024. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Phoebe F. King, Counsel for Defendant. Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 11 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation. Filed in State Court on 3/25/2024 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 12 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation, identifying Parker Hannifin Corporation, Rene Lopez. (King, Phoebe) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation (King, Phoebe) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation. (King, Phoebe) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 23STCV29726 Receipt No: ACACDC-37169155 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF ELLEN COHEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATIONS NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441(a), (b), #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF MARIA VACA BLANCO IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATIONS NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441(a), (b)) (Attorney Phoebe Frances King added to party Parker Hannifin Corporation(pty:dft))(King, Phoebe) Modified on 3/27/2024 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.