Wei Jung Chiang v. Safeco Insurance Company et al
Wei Jung Chiang |
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY and General Insurance Company of America |
2:2024cv02629 |
April 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Insurance Company of America, identifying Safeco Corporation, Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant General Insurance Company of America.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant General Insurance Company of America. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 24STCV04877 Receipt No: ACACDC-37200434 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant General Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint with Exhibits, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Addendum, #5 Exhibit E - State Court Assignment, #6 Exhibit F - State Court ADR Package) (Attorney Nicholas J. Boos added to party General Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Boos, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.