Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
| Samuel Good, Jr. |
| People of State of California |
| 2:2024cv02649 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
(IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Petition #1 Should Not Be Dismissed, and Denying Request for Appointment of Counsel #2 by Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner show cause in writing, no later than May 30, 2024, why the Court should not recommend dismissal of the petition for the reasons set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (ECF 2) is denied without prejudice. (tsn)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Samuel Good, Jr.. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number 16218. (fa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 3 Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition (CV-111). Upon submission of your petition for writ of habeas corpus, it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action may be dismissed. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . (et) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel and Declaration of Indigency filed by Petitioner Samuel Good, Jr. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S Christensen. (Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE.), filed by Petitioner Samuel Good, Jr. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Samuel Good, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: People of State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
