Brooke O'Donnell et al v. Crocs Retail, LLC et al
Brooke O'Donnell, Shantriece Mitchell, Qunae Wilkerson, Claudia Retana and Marina Monterroso |
Crocs Retail, LLC |
2:2024cv02726 |
April 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Petition to Quiet Title |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Crocs Retail, LLC. Exhibit 3 - Ahdoot & Wolfson Fee Declaration as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Terepka, Alexander) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Crocs Retail, LLC, identifying Crocs, Inc.. (Terepka, Alexander) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Crocs Retail, LLC (Terepka, Alexander) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of John Woodman re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Crocs Retail, LLC. (Terepka, Alexander) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Crocs Retail, LLC. (Terepka, Alexander) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, case number 24STCV05067 Receipt No: ACACDC-37223019 - Fee: $405, filed by defendant Crocs Retail, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Docket and Other Pleadings) (Attorney Alexander D. Terepka added to party Crocs Retail, LLC(pty:dft))(Terepka, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.