Ezequiel Moreno et al v. Clark Construction Group, LLC et al
Ezequiel Moreno, Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association and Minimally Invasive Surgical Association |
Clark Construction Group, LLC |
2:2024cv02750 |
April 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Clark Construction Group, LLC. (Masangkay, Eldrin) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Clark Construction Group, LLC (Masangkay, Eldrin) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Clark Construction Group, LLC, identifying Aetna Life Insurance Co.. (Masangkay, Eldrin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Clark Construction Group, LLC. (Masangkay, Eldrin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 23STCV23882 Receipt No: ACACDC-37228209 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Clark Construction Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2. court case file, #3 Exhibit 3. Articles of Incorporation, #4 Exhibit 2. (excerpt) Answer) (Attorney Eldrin Andrew Masangkay added to party Clark Construction Group, LLC(pty:dft))(Masangkay, Eldrin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.