Dr. Mehmet Veli Aslan M.D. v. Nazanin Mazgani et al
Mehmet Aslan and Dr. Mehmet Veli Aslan M.D. |
Nazanin Mazgani, Neyaz Mazgani, Clemente R. Cuevas and Does 1-10 inclusive |
2:2024cv02762 |
April 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Steve Kim |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Clemente R. Cuevas, Nazanin Mazgani, Neyaz Mazgani. (sh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mehmet Aslan, identifying Nazanin Mazgani, Neyaz Mazgani, Clemente Cuevas. (Bhola, Vipan) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mehmet Aslan. (Bhola, Vipan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mehmet Aslan. (Bhola, Vipan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37230644 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Mehmet Aslan. (Attorney Vipan K Bhola added to party Mehmet Aslan(pty:pla))(Bhola, Vipan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.