Robert Mena v. Ava Mirzaei et al
| Robert Mena |
| Ava Mirzaei doing business as Teuscher Swiss Chocolates & Cafe, Poole Properties, Inc. and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2024cv02789 |
| April 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ava Mirzaei, Poole Properties, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Robert Mena. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Robert Mena. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37235525 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Robert Mena(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause within fourteen (14) days of this order. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Failure to comply with any of the requirements set forth in this Order will result in dismissal of Plaintiff's claims as to the Defendant that is the subject of the required proof of service, request for default, or motion for default judgment and/or the action in its entirety. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
